Amazon Photos vs. Google Photos: Which service is best for storage and sharing?

(Image credit: Amazon/ Google)

Google Photos and Amazon Photos are two of the best photo storage and sharing sites for their relatively low costs and large storage. Only when it comes to deciding between Amazon Photos vs. Google Photos for storing your pictures, which is all-time for you?

Google Photos and Amazon Photos are 2 of the biggest names in the Cloud storage business, allowing you lot to seamlessly support images from all of your devices, and equally a result are two of the most popular. Read on to see how these 2 companies stack up against one another.

How to employ Google Photos
How to upload to Google Photos
How to delete Google Photos permanently

Amazon Photos vs. Google Photos: Price and Storage

The price of these two photograph storing services is related to how much space you need. The more GB or TB of space yous need, the bigger dent you will feel on your wallet.

Google Photos once offered unlimited storage, only at present gives you but 15GB of gratuitous storage per Gmail account to be shared across Drive, Gmail and Photos. Users can purchase boosted space for photo storage by condign a Google One member.

Google Ane Membership rates:
100 GB — $19.99 per twelvemonth
200 GB — $29.99 per yr
2 TB — $99.99 per year

Google One also offers storage plans of 10 TB, xx TB and 30 TB, but these are paid on a monthly basis and actually intended to be used by entities, rather than individuals.

Using Amazon Photos requires an Amazon Prime number account, which costs $119 a twelvemonth. If you lot've bought into the Prime membership, you get free unlimited full-resolution photo storage, and upward to 5 GB of video storage. Additional storage space for video can be purchased also. If you sign up for a Prime business relationship you tin requite up to 5 friends and family members unlimited photo storage equally well.

Amazon Photos rates:
100 GB — $19.99 a year
ane TB — $59.99 a twelvemonth
2 TB — $119.98 a year

Winner: Tie. Google Photos is less expensive if you're only using it for photo and video storage, but an Amazon Prime number subscription gets you lot other benefits.

Amazon Photos vs. Google Photos: Editing Features

While neither Amazon Photos nor Google Photos should be considered a replacement for the best photo editing software, both allow you brand some touch ups to your images.

Google Photos allows y'all to practice small edits on images once they've been uploaded. Users tin crop, alter aspect ratio, adjust "lite," "colour" and "popular" or utilize filters and suit intensity. It'southward user friendly, but doesn't give you nearly as much control as an app like Instagram does. A clever feature allows yous to click and hold on the image to compare the original file to the edited version.

Amazon Photos has more robust editing options. You can make adjustments to brightness, saturation, dissimilarity, gamma, clarity, exposures, shadows and highlights. You tin also suit image focus, add text, crop, rotate and alter epitome ratios. Amazon Photos features more than than 70 filters that tin exist applied to your images as well.

Winner: Amazon Photos

Google Photos allows you to create albums that can be shared publicly or with specific people. You can sort images by People, Places and Things. The People category uses facial recognition software and volition group these photos together; y'all tin add tags to your friends and then when the plan sees detail people in a photo it volition suggest sharing it with them as the program is associated with your Gmail account. If this level of calculator learning freaks you lot out merely don't characterization any of the faces in your grouping. Facial recognition can be deactivated under Settings. The service does an excellent job at sorting photos by type as well—food photos, pet pictures, certain styles of compages will all exist grouped together for easy searching.

Photos can exist shared by selecting the upload icon, from there you volition be offered all the standard options for sharing: email, Facebook, Twitter or text. You can besides generate a unique URL.

Amazon Photos motorcar tags photos every bit y'all upload them to the service. Like Google Photos, for facial recognition to work y'all volition need to manually enter the names of the people in the images. Places sorts images based on where they were taken. With places you can sort photos into groups based on image content.

A feature chosen "Family Vault" lets you lot share specific pictures with family members, while a new feature chosen "Groups" lets y'all organize pictures together and share with a larger group of people—useful if you are roofing events or parties. The Prime Photos app volition periodically ship notifications to your phone regarding pictures that are stored in the service, making suggestions of what to share based on anniversaries of when images were taken. These images can be shared to your social media platforms every bit well.

Winner: Tie

Amazon Photos vs. Google Photos: Press services

Both Google Photos and Amazon Photos give users the option to order prints or art canvases and create photograph books.

Google Photos offers photo prints in the following sizes: 4x6, 5x7 and 8x10. Prints start at 25 cents for 4x6 and tin can exist picked up at CVS, Walgreens or Walmart locations. Pricing depends on your region. Canvas prints can be ordered in 8x8 for $19.99, 11x14 for $29.99 or 16x20 for $44.99. Canvas prints are shipped. Photo books tin also be created using the service and start at $9.99 per book.

Amazon Photos allows you to print your images on a wider diversity of products. In improver to art prints, canvases and books, you tin lodge holiday cards, coffee mugs, ornaments, and fifty-fifty fleece blankets. 4x6 prints are fifteen cents, 5x7 are 58 cents and 8x10 prints are $1.79. You tin can order larger prints from Amazon Photos as well: 11x14 for $five.99, 12x18 for $9.49, 16x20 for $12.49 and 20x30 for $16.99. In improver to canvas prints Amazon Photos too offers its printing services on forest and aluminum. Photo book printing starts at $21.99. Although Amazon's impress pricing is more than affordable than Google Photos, in our experience the quality is subpar.

If you are looking for quality prints or photo books yous are probably better off ordering straight from 1 of the all-time photo volume services.

Winner: Tie (though neither excels here)

Amazon Photos vs. Google Photos: Mobile Apps

Let'southward confront it: The majority of photos nosotros take are on our smartphones, then any photograph storage service should accept an app that can automatically fill-in your photos. Both Amazon and Google take apps that are compatible with iOS and Android devices, and requite y'all the option to backup your entire camera roll to the services. You lot can also manually select what y'all'd like to add together, if you aren't bang-up on giving the services full access to the photos on your phone, or want to save some storage infinite. Both apps characteristic the ability to organize images into albums and share photos with your friends or to social media sites. The biggest difference between the two lies between what the apps is what their pattern encourages users to do side by side.

Amazon is primarily a website for shopping, and so it's no surprise that upon opening the Amazon Photo app it encourages users to order prints from the platform. This makes sense, since they are a shopping platform, but equally previously mentioned, the prints and photo books that Amazon Photos produces are pretty low quality.

Google Photos has a much simpler interface. When you open the app it shows you photos in your photographic camera roll. In that location is an option to search and yous can encounter your library (this is where the photos that y'all choose to backup and organize into albums will announced). You can notwithstanding order prints through the app, but it isn't the first tab that you see when yous open up the app.

Ultimately, the Google Photos app is a better way to store and sort your images, rather than selling you lot sub-par prints of your images.

Winner: Google Photos

Amazon Photos vs. Google Photos: Lesser Line

Selecting the best photo storage and sharing service for y'all depends a lot on the services that you are already using. Google Photos and Amazon Photos both let you to seamlessly backup images from all of your devices and offering a lot of similar features when it comes to sharing and sorting.

Google Photos offers 15 GB of free storage with your Gmail account and the pricing on their upgraded Google Ane Membership plans are cheaper than what Amazon offers—especially because that you will demand to pay $119 in Prime Membership fees to fifty-fifty access Amazon Photos. All the same, if you already take an Amazon Prime membership (or admission to one through a friend or family fellow member) the gratuitous unlimited photo storage that it offers is a dandy option.

	Amazon Photos	Google Photos
Toll	✓	✓
Editing features	✓
Tagging and Sharing	✓	✓
Printing services	✓	✓
App		✓
Totals	4	4

Amazon Photos offers more editing control than Google Photos does — which is great if y'all don't have access to a proper photo editing program. But, it's worth downloading ane of the best photograph editing apps.

Each has the option for machine learning when it comes to tagging and identifying people, places and things in your images. Storing pictures in Amazon won't impact the amount of storage of your Gmail account or Google Bulldoze. Although Amazon Photos and Google Photos both offer printing services, you're ameliorate off using a defended print service.

Although Google Photos doesn't offer equally substantial editing features as Amazon Photos, information technology's free to get started since all yous need is a Gmail account, and the pricing structure for adding more storage is cheaper than purchasing a Prime Account. And so once again, a Prime account offers other benefits.

Although the apps for both services are very similar in terms of what they offer, we preferred the simple UI of Google Photos and that it seemed more focused on storage and organization, rather than selling a subpar printed product. For these reasons we're declaring Google Photos the (slight) winner when it comes to photograph storage and sharing.

Source: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/amazon-photos-vs-google-photos

Posted by: walkerproke1945.blogspot.com

Amazon Photos vs. Google Photos: Which service is best for storage and sharing?